top of page

The Problems with Attachment Theory

In psychology, Attachment Theory stands as a cornerstone, offering profound insights into the intricacy of human relationships. Developed by John Bowlby in the mid-20th century, it paints a vivid picture of how our early interactions with caregivers shape the very fabric of our being, influencing everything from our self-esteem to our ability to form intimate connections. 

However, beneath its seemingly sturdy foundation lie complexities and controversies. As we delve deeper into the nuances of human attachment, we uncover its challenges and critiques, each adding depth to our understanding while simultaneously casting shadows of doubt upon its universal applicability. 

It's amidst this intellectual turbulence and oversimplification by dating gurus and social media influencers that we dip into the slightly muddy waters of Attachment Theory.


The society who cried "Mother!"

Attachment theory's focus on maternal caregiving and the mother-child bond may be overly scrutinizing towards the mother. This may perpetuate gender stereotypes and neglect the role of fathers and other caregivers in the child's development. What part does the co-parent play? What influence can other parental figures have? For now, these questions remain up to interpretation. The theory needs trimming to fit the cookie-cutter of modern life. 


"Your cute Jeans?"

Attachment theory emphasizes the early caregiver-infant interactions in forming bonds. However, the role of biological factors, such as temperament and genetics, in influencing attachment patterns remain its blind spots. Critics argue that a more comprehensive understanding of attachment should consider both biological predispositions and environmental influences.


Pop Psychology

The fame that attachment styles have had in pop psychology dates decades back, making a comeback stronger than the 90s trend in 2010 with the book "Attached: The New Science of Adult Attachment and How It Can Help You Find — and Keep — Love" It has only seen exponential growth through dating gurus and social media influencers! "Do you want to add an Atlantic Ocean worth of space between you and your partner?"- You may be a person with Avoidant Attachment Style! 

"I can't help it; I'm an individual with Anxious Attachment Style!" These are just 2 of the zillion phrases used by social media users, people in relationships, or anyone educated on the surface about attachment theory. In such cases, it's super convenient to deny accountability, generate intellectual justifications, or over-identify to the extent that it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.


Modern Family:

Attachment theory traditionally hyper-focused on parent-child attachments within nuclear family structures. However, it may not fully account for the complex webs of attachment dynamics in diverse family arrangements, such as single-parent families, same-sex parent families, or extended families. It has never studied enmeshed family cultures like that of India, and therefore, it remains rigid when evolution in family structure demands fluidity.


The Black Sheep:

While attachment theory categorizes individuals into attachment styles (secure, insecure-avoidant, insecure-anxious/ambivalent, etc.), it oversimplifies the complexity of human relationships and individual differences. People may exhibit different attachment behaviors in different contexts or relationships, which are not fully captured by the theory. I may grow up in a secure home, but what if my current relationship seems so priceless to me that only to them is I an anxious partner? 


Once upon a 20, my life changed:

Attachment theory suggests that early attachment experiences shape individuals' attachment styles, which remain relatively stable over time. But imagine this: you are friends with someone, they are an integral part of your life, and one fine day, you've been betrayed. Will you ever be the same again? If your answer is no, various research findings agree with you! The stability of attachment styles across the lifespan has been inconsistent, raising questions about the theory's assumption of stability.


So, dear reader, remember that the Theory of Attachment comes in the most glittering box finished with the cutest bow. But who's to say what lies inside? More importantly, do you like what lies inside? Do you want it? Or is it suited to your needs?

-Rinaaz Nadaf

42 views0 comments


bottom of page